What is Tie?
B2C identity resolution platform that reveals website visitor data without forms
Tie puts your campaigns in one place instead of scattered across a dozen tabs. It's built for teams that ship campaigns weekly, not once a quarter.
How We Evaluated Tie
We scored Tie on five things: campaign management, audience targeting, analytics integration, automation capabilities, and reporting clarity. Same rubric we use for every marketing tool in the directory, so the scores are comparable.
That meant using the product, testing the features that matter most for marketing work, reading the docs, and checking whether pricing is upfront or hidden behind a sales call. We also compared it against ActiveCampaign and Sintra to see where it stands.
Key Features
What Tie actually gives you:
- Campaign Management: Plan, execute, and track marketing campaigns
- Audience Targeting: Reach the right people with segmentation tools
- Performance Analytics: Measure campaign ROI and key metrics
Pricing
Tie doesn't list pricing publicly on their website, so you'll need to reach out to their sales team for a quote. That's fairly common for tools aimed at larger teams, but it does make it harder to evaluate quickly.
To give you a rough sense of the market, comparable marketing tools like ActiveCampaign and Sintra charge in the range of custom pricing to custom pricing/mo, which should help you calibrate expectations.
Pros and Cons
What we like
- This is a tool built specifically for marketing, which means the features are tailored to real use cases in this space rather than being generic functionality that sort of applies
- The campaign workflows feel like they were designed by someone who's actually run marketing at a real company. They follow the natural rhythm of how campaigns get planned, launched, and measured
- It focuses on doing one thing well rather than trying to be a Swiss Army knife, which usually means the core features get more development attention and polish than they would in an all-in-one platform
What could be better
- Pricing isn't listed publicly, so you'll have to sit through a sales call just to find out if it's in your budget. That alone is a friction point for smaller teams
- Because it focuses on marketing specifically, you'll still need separate tools for sales, customer support, and other functions. It won't replace your entire stack
- Larger organizations with complex requirements may find that some of the advanced features they expect from enterprise software are missing or underdeveloped
Tie Alternatives
If Tie isn't the right fit, here are the closest competitors worth looking at:
| Tool | What it does | Pricing |
|---|---|---|
| ActiveCampaign | ActiveCampaign is a business tool available at activecampaign.com. Sign up to see prici... | From $15/mo |
| Sintra | AI employees platform with 12 specialised helpers (Soshie, Penn, Cassie, Milli, Seomi a... | From $97/mo |
| HubSpot | All-in-one CRM platform with marketing, sales, and customer service tools for growing b... | Free tier + paid |
| Auware | AI campaign platform that auto-generates persona-specific landing page variants | From $199/mo |
We track hundreds of marketing tools in our tools directory. Worth browsing if none of these match what you need.
Who It's For (and Who It's Not)
Good fit: Tie makes the most sense for marketing teams and agencies that are juggling multiple campaigns simultaneously and need a central place to plan, execute, and measure everything without losing track of what's running where. If that sounds like your situation, it's worth at least testing it out.
Skip it if: you only run one campaign a quarter and it's mostly a single email blast, this level of tooling adds complexity without giving you much in return. In that case, you might want to look at ActiveCampaign as a lighter-weight option.
Bottom Line
We gave Tie 3.8/5. Does its core job well. Worth the investment if marketing is central to your daily work. If you only need it occasionally, look at a simpler option.
In short: Tie is a strong choice for marketing teams and agencies that are juggling multiple campaigns simultaneously and need a central place to plan. you only run one campaign a quarter and it's mostly a single email blast, this level of tooling adds complexity without giving you much in return.
Try TieHow Tie works
Tie (formerly Revenue Roll, now at meettie.com) is a shopper-identity and intent platform for consumer ecommerce brands. It de-anonymizes website visitors against a US consumer identity graph, enriches them with demographic attributes, scores how likely each shopper is to open, click or buy in the next day, and pushes all of that into the email, SMS and ad tools you already run. The point is to turn anonymous traffic into addressable, prioritized audiences without waiting for a form fill or a purchase.
Setup is a tag on the site plus connected destinations. Three modules then sit on one data layer. Tie ID resolves known and anonymous visitors against a graph the vendor describes as 280M+ US shopper identities carrying 200+ attributes each, sourced from 1,000+ web data sources. Tie Predict writes a daily refreshed intent score back to your ESP as a profile property, which you then use as an inclusion or exclusion filter inside Klaviyo segments and flows. Tie Priority is an add-on that runs inside your existing Klaviyo account and optimizes sends for Gmail Primary-tab placement without making you change ESP.
Day-to-day configuration is mostly three decisions: the match-rate threshold you accept, the audience filters, and the destination mappings. Destinations named on the site are Klaviyo, Attentive and Shopify, plus generic ESP, SMS, programmatic display and direct-mail activation. Tie integrates with consent management platforms and auto-suppresses consumers who opt out.
Where Tie wins
- It publishes a number instead of hiding behind a demo. Tie claims a 54%+ average traffic ID rate and a 90% match rate, and explicitly contrasts that with the roughly 15% typical of other visitor-ID tools.
- Pricing is public and itemized. Starter is $499/mo for 300K annual credits, Growth $1,499/mo for 1.2M, Enterprise $2,499/mo for 3M, with 25% off for annual prepay and stated overage rates of $0.05, $0.04 and $0.03 per credit.
- Unlimited users on every tier, with SSO and a dedicated Slack channel included even on the entry plan.
- Predict scores refresh daily off on-site and off-site signals, so they can rank shoppers who have no CRM history at all, which 30/60/90-day engagement segments cannot do.
- Deliverability is a product, not your problem. Tie Priority targets Gmail Primary-tab placement with a stated typical time to placement of 24 hours.
Where it falls short
- The identity graph is US-only. If a meaningful share of your traffic sits outside the US, the match-rate claim does not apply to it, and the site offers no non-US coverage.
- No free tier and no free trial. Every plan is an annual contract. Monthly-paid plans only get an opt-out window (180 days on Starter, 90 on Growth), and annual prepay removes the opt-out entirely.
- Klaviyo dependence. Priority is described as running inside an existing Klaviyo account, and Predict leans the same way, so non-Klaviyo senders get a thinner product.
- Credit metering ties cost to traffic. Enrichment and reveal draw on the same unit, so a high-traffic, low-AOV store can burn an allowance quickly and land in overage.
- Identity resolution of anonymous visitors is a regulatory grey zone. The site claims CCPA alignment, SOC 2 and consent-platform integration, but GDPR is not claimed, and the compliance burden of using this data sits with your brand.
Who should use Tie
Tie fits US-focused DTC and ecommerce brands doing real volume on Shopify plus Klaviyo, where a few extra points of list growth or email revenue comfortably cover a four- to five-figure annual commitment. If you already know your email program is capped by how few visitors you can identify, and you send through Klaviyo, the modules line up with how you work.
Skip it if you sell B2B, if most of your traffic is outside the US (the graph simply does not cover those visitors), or if you need to test before committing to a year. There is no trial, so the smallest realistic experiment is a Starter contract, and that is a decision to make with your finance team rather than on a whim.