vs
SimpleTexting vs Salesmsg
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, features, and trade-offs — which one actually fits your team.
What each tool does
SimpleTexting: SimpleTexting is the SMS marketing platform for businesses that want to send broadcasts, two-way messages, and drip campaigns by text. Founded in 2010, SimpleTexting serves over 13,000 businesses including major US brands and SMBs across retail, restaurants, gyms, nonprofits, and healthcare.
Salesmsg: The HubSpot integration is the deepest I have tested among SMS platforms. Two-way texting appears on the contact timeline alongside emails, calls, and meetings. You can trigger texts from HubSpot workflows, which means automated follow-ups like "Thanks for downloading our guide,. Want to schedule a quick call?" go out without a rep touching anything.
SimpleTexting vs Salesmsg at a glance
| SimpleTexting | Salesmsg | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Paid | Paid $25/mo (500 msgs), $49/mo (1K), $99/mo (2.5K), $179/mo (5K) |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Category | customer support | sales |
| Best for | SimpleTexting is a business tool available at simpletexting | AI-native SMS, calling, and AI agent platform built natively for HubSpot and Salesforce |
| Top strength | Easy setup: most teams send first campaign within an hour. | See review |
| Main limitation | Credit-based pricing: predicting costs requires tracking volume. | Mobile app is mediocre: Slow to load, notifications are sometimes delayed by 10-15 seconds, and the |
| Full review | SimpleTexting review → | Salesmsg review → |
Strengths & weaknesses
SimpleTexting highlights
Pros- Easy setup: most teams send first campaign within an hour.
- Strong automations: drip sequences and keyword triggers work well.
- Web widget for opt-ins: build SMS lists from your site easily.
- Mature compliance tooling: TCPA opt-in tracking, automatic STOP handling.
- Two-way support: conversations work alongside broadcasts.
- Credit-based pricing: predicting costs requires tracking volume.
- US/Canada only: international SMS limited.
- Marketing-first: less suited for two-way support workflows.
- Less depth than enterprise alternatives: Klaviyo SMS has better ecommerce automation.
Salesmsg highlights
Cons- Mobile app is mediocre: Slow to load, notifications are sometimes delayed by 10-15 seconds, and the interface feels like a scaled-down desktop app rather than a mobile-first design. Most of my team sticks to desktop.
- MMS delivery delays: Image messages occasionally take 30-60 seconds longer to deliver than plain SMS. Not a dealbreaker, but noticeable when you are sending time-sensitive follow-ups with screenshots or proposals.
- Reporting is surface-level: You get delivery rates, response rates, and basic conversation metrics. No custom dashboards, no funnel analysis, no way to track message-to-meeting conversion without pulling data into a separate tool.
- Costs add up at scale: At $179/month for 5,000 messages, plus AI agent fees, a 15-person team can easily spend $300-400/month. Competitors like SimpleTexting start at $39/month for 500 credits with cheaper per-message rates at higher volumes.
- Limited outside HubSpot/Salesforce: The Pipedrive and Zoho integrations exist but are basic. If you are not on HubSpot or Salesforce, you lose the main selling point.
Which should you pick?
Choose SimpleTexting if easy setup: most teams send first campaign within an hour.
Choose Salesmsg if its strengths match your priorities.
Still unsure? Read the deep-dive reviews: SimpleTexting and Salesmsg.
Frequently asked questions
Is SimpleTexting better than Salesmsg?
Which is cheaper, SimpleTexting or Salesmsg?
Can SimpleTexting replace Salesmsg?
Do you have an affiliate relationship with these tools?
Disclosure: some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.