--- title: "Newsletter Engagement by List Size | Dupple" url: "https://dupple.com/learn/newsletter-engagement-benchmarks" description: "Click-to-open falls 2x from a 29,489 subscriber list to a 803,515 one, measured the same way on the same platform. Open rates do not follow the same pattern." published: "2026-11-08" updated: "2026-11-08" llms_txt: "https://dupple.com/llms.txt" --- # Newsletter Engagement by List Size: What 6 Lists on One Platform Actually Report Trusted by 800,000+ Techpresso subscribers · Editorial policy · How we make money Written by Louis Corneloup Founder at Dupple, covering AI tools and strategies for 800K+ readers. How our guides are researched . November 8, 2026 · Updated November 2026 3 min read **Across 6 newsletters we operate on the same platform, totalling 964,052 subscribers, click-to-open rate falls 2x as list size grows.** AIpresso at 29,489 subscribers converts 5.5% of opens into clicks. Techpresso at 803,515 converts 2.7%. Open rate does not follow that pattern at all. Techpresso, the largest list here, has the **highest** open rate of the set at 36.9%. Size does not appear to cost you opens. It costs you what happens after the open. Most newsletter benchmarks aggregate survey responses across thousands of senders using different platforms, different definitions and different list hygiene. This is a smaller and narrower dataset, but every figure comes from one platform's API, measured identically, which makes the comparison between rows meaningful in a way cross-vendor averages are not. ## The numbers *The numbers: Newsletter Engagement by List Size: What 6 Lists on One Platform Actually Report. Last updated November 2026.* | Newsletter | Vertical | Subscribers | Open rate | Click rate | Click-to-open | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Techpresso | AI and tech | 803,515 | 36.9% | 1% | **2.7%** | | MarketingShot | marketing | 36,630 | 32.3% | 1.3% | **4%** | | Finpresso | finance and markets | 33,146 | 33.3% | 1.2% | **3.6%** | | Devshot | software development | 31,631 | 32% | 1.4% | **4.4%** | | Cyberpresso | cybersecurity | 29,641 | 31% | 1.2% | **3.9%** | | AIpresso | artificial intelligence | 29,489 | 30.8% | 1.7% | **5.5%** | Read from the Beehiiv API on 2026-11-08. Open and click rates are the platform's own trailing averages. Click-to-open is derived: click rate divided by open rate. ## Why click-to-open is the number to compare Raw open rates have been unreliable since Apple's Mail Privacy Protection began pre-fetching images, and they vary with list age and acquisition source more than with content quality. Comparing a 29,489 list to a 803,515 one on open rate compares two different deliverability situations. Click-to-open asks a narrower question that survives those problems: of the people who did open, how many went on to click. It isolates whether the content earned an action from an audience that was already looking at it. On that measure the spread here is 2x, and the direction is consistent: smaller lists convert attention into clicks far better. Raw click rate tells the same story slightly less cleanly, at 1.7x between the smallest and largest list. ## What actually causes the gap Three mechanisms, and only the first is about the newsletter itself. **Audience specificity.** A 29,489 subscriber list in one vertical is made of people who sought out that vertical. A 803,515 subscriber general-interest list contains many people who are interested in the category broadly and in any given story rarely. The larger list is not worse written; it is answering a wider question. **Accumulated inactives.** Large lists are usually old lists. Subscribers who still open out of habit but stopped clicking years ago remain counted in the denominator, and they suppress click-to-open without any change in the product. **Link density per interest.** A specialist newsletter can link to something every reader plausibly wants. A general one links to a spread, and each individual link addresses a fraction of the audience. The practical reading for anyone buying newsletter placement: raw subscriber count and click volume are not proportional, and the ratio moves against you as lists grow. A list ten times the size does not deliver ten times the clicks. ## Median figures across this set The median open rate here is **32.3%** and the median click rate **1.3%**, across 6 B2B and tech newsletters. Those are useful as a sanity check on any benchmark you are quoted, with two caveats worth stating. First, this is one platform. Deliverability and measurement differ enough between providers that cross-platform comparison of open rates is close to meaningless. Second, 6 lists is a small sample and they share an operator, an editorial approach and largely one acquisition strategy. What this dataset supports is the relationship between size and engagement measured consistently. It does not support a claim about the industry. ## How we measure - **Source.** Beehiiv API v2, publication stats, fields `average_open_rate` and `average_click_rate`, read 2026-11-08. - **Subscribers.** Active subscriptions on the same call. Figures are per publication, not deduplicated across lists. - **Click-to-open.** Derived as click rate divided by open rate. Not reported by the platform. - **Refresh.** Regenerated from the same weekly job that updates our audience figures, so the numbers and the date always move together. - **Correction, August 2026.** Our previously published open rates were typed in by hand and never refreshed, overstating several lists by up to nine points. These come from the API. ## Frequently asked questions **What is a good newsletter open rate in 2026?** Across these 6 lists the median is 32.3%, ranging from 30.8% to 36.9%. Treat any single benchmark figure carefully: open rate is heavily affected by privacy features that pre-fetch images and by how recently the list was built. **What is a good click-to-open rate?** The lists here run from 2.7% to 5.5%, and the smaller and more specialised the audience, the higher it goes. If you are comparing your own, compare against lists of a similar size rather than against an industry average. **Do bigger lists perform worse?** Not on opens. In this set the largest list has the highest open rate. They perform worse on converting those opens into clicks, by a factor of 2. ## Related reading - [What software actually charges, by category](https://dupple.com/learn/saas-pricing-index), from the same approach applied to pricing. - [Advertise with Dupple](https://dupple.com/advertise) for the current audience figures and formats. Some offers on this page may be paid placements or contain affiliate links. Related Articles Article ### Best AI Newsletters to Advertise In (2026): For Builders and for Business Teams AI newsletters that sell sponsorships, split by reader: builders and business teams. Every audience figure is as stated by each publisher, read Nov 2026. Article ### Product Management Newsletters for Advertisers Eight newsletters for product people that sell sponsorships, with audience figures and formats as each publisher states them, read 5 November 2026. Article ### Best Tech Newsletters to Advertise In (2026) Tech and AI newsletters that sell sponsorships, compared on audience, readers and formats. Every figure is as stated by each publisher, read Nov 2026. Article ### Best B2B Newsletters to Advertise In (2026), by the Buyer You Need to Reach B2B newsletters that sell sponsorships, grouped by the buyer function they reach, with audience figures as stated by each publisher, read Nov 2026. Article ### Data and Analytics Newsletters for Advertisers Compare data and analytics newsletter sponsorships using publisher evidence, audience definitions and current placement questions. Blog Post ### Investor Newsletters to Advertise In Compare investor newsletter sponsorship options across venture capital, fund operations and retail investing audiences.